Connect with us

National

Supreme Court Asks Centre To Come Out With Community Kitchen Policy Decision – dot newz

Published

on


The Supreme Court granted two weeks to Manipur to deposit the costs imposed by it. (File)

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court Wednesday asked the Centre to come out with some policy decisions concerning the implementation of the Community Kitchen Scheme by taking into consideration other similar schemes which are in operation in different states.

The Supreme Court also took note of incidents of alleged hunger deaths and malnutrition of children in some states and asked them to file short replies by identifying the districts/talukas/villages where such incidents have taken place or taking place.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana said there is a need to coordinate with the state governments/Union territories and their opinion should also be taken into consideration by the Centre before finalisation of the Community Kitchen Scheme.

“We are of the considered view that until and unless the state governments are involved with regard to implementation of the scheme, it would be difficult to implement the same.

“Under the circumstances, it would be appropriate that the Union of India should come out with some policy decision with regard to implementation of the Community Kitchen Scheme by taking into consideration the other similar schemes relating to the community kitchen which are already in operation in different states,” the bench said.

The Supreme Court asked the counsel appearing for the Delhi government and the Union Territory of Ladakh to file their respective counter-affidavits within two weeks from today, without fail.

Additional Solicitor General Madhvi Divan, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that the issues which are raised in this petition about creating community kitchens to take care of hunger deaths or malnutrition of children are under active consideration of the Union of India and they are awaiting expert reports on the subject.

The bench also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli directed the Centre to interact with the concerned stakeholders as well as for finalisation of the probable date of holding a meeting with the state governments/Union territories on the subject.

The bench also directed Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, and Bihar to file short replies on the incidents of alleged hunger deaths and malnutrition of children.

“Counsel appearing for the states of UP, MP, Maharashtra, Odisha, and Bihar are directed to file their respective short replies about the aforesaid issues and identify the districts/talukas/villages where these deaths/malnutrition have/are taking place, on the next date of hearing without fail,” the bench said.

It also granted two weeks to Manipur to deposit the costs imposed by it and made it clear that no further extension of time would be granted for the said purpose.

“Counsel appearing for all those states which have not so far deposited costs pursuant to order of this court are granted four weeks from today for the said purpose. The registry is directed to invest the costs deposited by the states in an interest-earning fixed deposit receipts on a short term basis in any nationalized bank with auto-renewal facility which gives more interest,” the bench said while posting the matter for next hearing on November 16.

The Supreme Court, on February 17 last year, had imposed an additional cost of Rs 5 lakh each on six states for not complying with its directions to file their affidavits on the PIL, which sought formulation of the scheme to set up community kitchens for the poor.

The additional cost of Rs 5 lakh each was imposed on Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Odisha, Goa, and Delhi.

Advocate Ashima Mandla, appearing for the PIL petitioners, was asked by the bench to prepare a chart of all the states who have filed their replies to the PIL.

She had said 69 per cent of children under the age of five have lost their lives due to malnutrition and it is high time that states take steps to set up community kitchens.

The Supreme Court had on October 18, 2019, favoured setting up of community kitchens, saying the country needs this kind of a system to tackle the problem of hunger.

It had issued notices to the Centre and all states asking for their responses on a PIL seeking directions to all the states and Union territories (UTs) to formulate a scheme for community kitchens to combat hunger and malnutrition.

The plea had claimed that many children under the age of five die every day due to hunger and malnutrition and this condition was violative of various fundamental rights, including the right to food and the life of citizens.

The PIL, filed by social activists Anun Dhawan, Ishann Dhawan, and Kunjana Singh, had also sought a direction to the Centre for creating a national food grid for people falling outside the purview of the public distribution scheme.

It had also sought the issuance of an order to the National Legal Services Authority (NLSA) for formulating a scheme to mitigate hunger-related deaths.

The plea referred to the state-funded community kitchens being run in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Odisha, Jharkhand, and Delhi that serve meals at subsidised rates in hygienic conditions.

The plea also referred to the concepts of the soup kitchen, meal centre, food kitchen, or community kitchen in other countries where food is offered to the hungry usually for free or sometimes at below-market price rates.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

National

India Is No.1 Food Supplier To Arab Nations After 15 Years – dot newz

Published

on

By


The Arab world is among Brazil’s most important trade partners.

Sao Paulo:

India surpassed Brazil in food exports to the League of Arab States for the first time in 15 years as the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted trade flows in 2020, according to data provided by the Arab-Brazil Chamber of Commerce to Reuters on Tuesday.

The Arab world is among Brazil’s most important trade partners, but its distance from those markets took its toll as the pandemic rattled global logistics.

Brazil accounted for 8.15% of the total agribusiness products imported by the 22 League members last year, whereas India captured 8.25% of that trade, ending Brazil’s 15-year advantage, the data showed.

Despite remaining competitive “from the farm gate in,” Brazil lost ground to India and other exporters such as Turkey, the United States, France and Argentina amid a disruption of traditional shipping routes.

Brazilian shipments to Saudi Arabia that once took 30 days could now take up to 60 days, according to the Chamber, whereas India’s geographic advantages allow it to ship fruits, vegetables, sugar, grains and meat in as little as week.

Brazil’s agricultural exports to the Arab League rose just 1.4% by value to $8.17 billion last year. Between January and October this year, sales totaled $6.78 billion, up 5.5%, as logistics problems subsided, Chamber data showed.

China’s push to boost its own food inventories during the pandemic also diverted some of Brazil’s trade with the Arabs, leading countries such as Saudi Arabia to step up promotion of domestic food production, while seeking alternative suppliers.

“It’s a turning point. The Saudis are still big buyers, but they are also net re-exporters of food,” the Chamber said in a statement.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Continue Reading

National

“BJP Development? Coconut Breaks A Road Open!” Akhilesh Yadav Sneers – dot newz

Published

on

By


Lucknow:

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, ally Jayant Choudhary at his side, berated Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and the BJP on multiple issues today — including development, which the ruling party placed front and centre of the coming election. “What infrastructure has the BJP created,” he questioned, citing a recent headline from Bijnore that has raised many a chuckle in the state.

“The older tradition was — hit the coconut on the road and the coconut breaks. The new tradition they have started is hit the coconut on ground and the ground must break,” he told NDTV, speaking on the sidelines of a rally in Mathura attended by thousands.

Suchi Mausam Chaudhary, the BJP MLA from Bijnor Sadar, was left furious earlier this month at the traditional inauguration when bits of a 7-km road, renovated at a cost of Rs 1.16 crore, came off when struck by a coconut.

Challengers to the BJP government which came to power in the state with a sweeping mandate, the two leaders made a prediction. “Looking at anger among the people, BJP can even lose 400 seats. They will be wiped out in the western UP,” Akhilesh Yadav said.

Their sharpest barbs were reserved for Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.

In his address, Mr Yadav had spoken of the BJP “misrule” in terms of jobs, education development and farmers’ issues. Asked about his remark that the “Baba (Yogi Adityanath) just sits in Gorakhpur and rings a bell (while all this is happennig),” and how it would be received by the state’s Hindu voters, Rashtriya Lok Dal chief Jayant Chaudhary spoke up.

“Adityanath is not a symbol of Hindu unity, he can be questioned,” Mr Chaudhary said. “This is not an issue about Hindu pride but issues like unemployment. Adityanath said he will give 70 lakh jobs. Today, their own posters say they have given only four lakh jobs,” he added.

Akhilesh Yadav had other questions. “The Chief Minister should answer whether the man sitting in the jeep that mowed down farmers (in Lakhimpur Kheri) was the Union Home Minister’s son or not… Yogi must answer how many cases were against him that he removed himself after becoming the Chief Minister,” he added.



Source link

Continue Reading

National

Women’s Commission Seeks Report On BJP Leader’s Remark About Mumbai Mayor – dot newz

Published

on

By


Kishori Pednekar is the current Mayor of Mumbai. (File)

The Maharashtra State Commission for Women has asked the Mumbai police commissioner to submit a factual report about an alleged objectionable remark passed by BJP leader Ashish Shelar about mayor Kishori Pednekar in connection with the recent cylinder blast in Worli.

Taking to Twitter, the Commission’s chairperson Rupali Chakankar said “insulting” comments made about women by responsible public representatives “will not be tolerated”.

The Commission has, therefore, taken a “serious” note of the comment and asked the Mumbai police chief to submit a factual report in this connection, Ms Chakankar tweeted on Monday night.

In her letter to the police commissioner, Ms Chakankar claimed, “Shelar’s comment ”the Mumbai Mayor visited (those injured in the blast) after 72 hours of the incident, where were you (the mayor) sleeping for these many hours?” is being broadcast in the news media”.

“So, a factual report should be submitted in this connection as per section 12(2) and 12(3) of the Maharashtra State Commission for Women Act, 1993,” she said.

Three members of a family died after a gas cylinder exploded in their home in a chawl in Worli area of central Mumbai.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Dot Newz | Developed by MCVP Group 8